No 1 (2020)

In this article, I analyze the arguments against the importance of the ontological and epistemological issues of modern physics. The connection between physics and philosophy is examined on the basis of several concepts of the connection between philosophy and science. I conclude that only physicists can effectively solve the philosophical issues of their field of science. Subsequently, it can accelerate the revolutionary transformations in the physical picture of the world.

Despite various interpretations of Heidegger's philosophy, he is undeniably a deep critic of the metaphysical tradition in European philosophy. His task of overcoming metaphysics once again aroused interest in the fundamental issues of life in the era of the total dominance of private sciences. In the article, the authors explore the concept of metaphysics and its criticism in the work of M. Heidegger, as well as subsequent interpretations, in particular by O. Peggeler (“New Ways with Heidegger”, 1992). Criticism of metaphysics was a necessary condition for overcoming it to build a fundamental ontology. Having experienced the influence of Nietzsche, Heidegger does not remain a Nietzschean, because he considers him the last metaphysician to be overcome. In this regard, Peggeler recognizes Heidegger's main work not as “Being and Time”, but as “Reports to Philosophy” (1936), where he sought to reveal the primary sources of the concept of metaphysics. Heidegger's views regarding the interpretation of the development of metaphysics in different historical eras are specially considered.

The article examines the relationship between mathematical and physical realities. It is put forward that the information reality is a single fundamental objective reality. Information is understood as the objective reality perceived by the subject by means of touch bodies which it fixes and comprehends by means of various semantic propositions, logical-mathematical operations and calculations.

The work is devoted to the problem of the transcendent in modern physics. It is shown that the theory of relativity, but above all quantum mechanics, indicate the existence of a different mode of reality. It is with this “otherness” that the paradoxical flow of time observed in modern physics is connected.

The article discusses the status of a standard model of the fundamental types of interaction in the context of the concept of superinteraction. The latter is understood as a metaphysical cognitive phenomenon, formed in the bosom of the philosophy of physics at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries. The main attention is paid to cosmic microphysics as a branch of physical knowledge, revealing a single foundation of micro-, macroand megaworlds. The process of forming unifying conceptual models of the fundamental types of interactions is analyzed, and the mechanism of separation of superinteraction in the first second of the Big Bang into “daughter” branches is also considered.

The article discusses the foundations of a new metaphysics in the historical and informationalrelational aspects. The connection of these issues with the physics of the interaction of elementary particles is emphasized and analyzed. The analogy of concepts in physics and computer science is revealed. The results of a thought experiment on building the structure of switching information flows in physical and mathematical research are analyzed and explained. The experiment is analyzed on the basis of logical conclusions and introduced analogies. The conclusion is drawn on the legality of the transition from a new metaphysics to the foundations of fundamental physics. It is proposed to consider the new approach information and relational.

The authors of this article, wondering about science as a completely unique social phenomenon; o note (consider as a objective reality) the crisis of the foundations of modern science; o offer certain principles for creating a new science - «science from scratch»; o reflect on the role of scientific traditions, the specifics, framework and functions of scientific schools of the past, present and future, and most importantly, on the true meaning of scientific knowledge and the mission of a scientist.